We feel compelled by the nature of the attack in the dissenting opinion to spell out a response:
1. Some answer is required to the dissent's charge.2. Certainly we do not endorse "victimless crime."3. How that question is involved escapes us.4. Moreover, the constitutional issue is significant.5. Ultimately it must be addressed in light of precedent.6. Certainly the course of precedent is clear.7. Knowing that, our result is compelled.
|"Dear dissenting colleague, please read fn.2 vertically!"|