Order denying Motion to Clarify Judgment is appealable

The 6th District opinion here clarifies that a post-judgment order denying a motion to clarify the judgment was an appealable order because the issues it raised were different from those arising from an appeal from the judgment itself.

We conclude that the postjudgment order denying appellants’ motion to clarify is an appealable order. (See Misik v. D’Arco (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 1065, 1071 [order denying motion to amend judgment to add respondent as a judgment debtor was an appealable order].) The appeal in this case raises issues different from the appeal from the amended judgment.