TrueFiling's caselaw debut!

Yesterday 1/2 issued this unpub'd decision here dismissing an appeal because the opening brief is fatally non-compliant with the rules. Ho hum, happens every day. But in addition to some bizarre pro-per accusations against various 1 DCA justices, the court also expressly references TrueFiling--in what appears to be the very first mention of TrueFiling in a Court of Appeal decision:

After we received appellant’s opening brief in this appeal, which was not in compliance with the California Rules of Court, specifically rules 8.204(1)(C), 8.208(d)(1), and 8.212(c )(1), we issued an order directing the clerk of the court to reject appellant’s opening brief submitted in TrueFiling for correction in compliance with the California Rules of Court, and granting appellant leave to file his corrected brief within 20 days from the date of our order.