{Insert joke here about a summer opinion titled In re A.C. from Riverside must be about Air Conditioning!} For real analysis see Prof. Martin's post here.
Also published on Friday is an anti-SLAPP fees appeal affirming an award of $146K here.
And how about this unpub? Appeal is frivolous, but no sanctions against pro per appellant: "While generally speaking [pro per appellant] is held to the same standard as an attorney, his demonstrated lack of knowledge of basic legal principles is a marginal excuse for pursuing this meritless litigation."