Thornerv.SonyComputerEntm’tAmLLC669F3d1362,1365(Fed.Cir.2012).Instead, when written properly, it is 14 words: Thorner v. Sony Computer Entm't Am. LLC, 669 F.3d 1362, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Similar matters appeared throughout the brief."
Also in Law360 reporting on the Federal Circuit is AT&T Asks Full Fed. Circ. To Eye Sidley Blown Deadline Case, discussing AT&T's petition for rehearing en banc.
The Recorder profiles an appellate lawyer up north here.
No joke: High Court Flushes Fish Pedicure Appeal
Justice Hoffstadt's latest DJ article today is "It's Alive!" But What is it? about how "the California courts and the voters have together given life to the California Constitution in a way that has spawned a few consequences that no one expected."
|States serve as laboratories for experimentation...|