A new month brings a new set of monthly appellatety columns in the DJ!
Retired PJ Gilbert has Why? -- A retired judge humorously reflects on everyday frustrations--from cyclists without helmets and cell phone distractions to tattoos and modern expressions--before questioning why judicial opinions have become increasingly long and difficult to understand.
Myron Moskovitz has Are AI-generated briefs persuasive? -- AI can produce well-researched and logically organized appellate briefs, but experienced appellate lawyers remain better at strategic judgment, persuasive advocacy and anticipating the human factors that can influence judicial decision-making.
AI produces briefs that are strong on logic (usually), well-researched and very thorough. But not so strong on strategic thinking and sensitivity to a judge's human emotions. And AI's writing is pedestrian. ... AI is cheap and it can provide a good starting point. But I would never file one without having an experienced appellate attorney spend a few hours reviewing it. The risk and the stakes are just too high.