Law.com has Judge Bibas on Opinion Writing: Skip the '$5 Words,' Read More Fiction -- "A lot of [lawyers] have stopped reading enough good fiction and journalism, and need to unlearn the habits of using fancy Latinate legalisms. Why do we say ‘forthwith’ rather than ‘at once’? Why do we talk about the perpetrator exiting the vehicle and being apprehended, like we are cops trying to sound important?"
Sunday, August 23, 2026
Friday, August 21, 2026
8 new justices
Today's DJ has Commission confirms 8 Court of Appeal justices in 4 districts -- The appointments address retirements, a death and one elevation.
The Commission on Judicial Appointments confirmed eight California Court of Appeal justices over two days, filling vacancies across four appellate districts and elevating Justice Rashida Adams to presiding justice of the 2nd District Court of Appeal, Division 3.
Thursday, August 20, 2026
SCOTUS Bar article
The NYT (specifically The Docket, Adam Liptak's newsletter) has A Few Expert Lawyers Dominate Supreme Court Arguments, a New Study Finds -- Chief Justice Roberts, once such a lawyer, has said he has mixed feelings about the trend.
Chief Justice John Roberts has said that he sometimes misses the old days, when “the sole practitioner with the battered briefcase” would arrive in Washington from far away to argue a once-in-a-career case at the Supreme Court. These days, arguments are dominated by a small number of polished lawyers who specialize in Supreme Court advocacy. A new study prepared for The New York Times confirmed the change.
Closer to home, the DJ has issued its Top 40 Under 40 (2026) including the ACLU's Neil Sawhney, Manatt's Zach Howe, and H&L's Rebecca Powell.
4 new justices
The Recorder has Calif. Commission Confirms 4 State Appeals Court Justices -- Among those confirmed Thursday was David Sapp, Gov. Gavin Newsom's legal affairs secretary.
Sapp was one of four court of appeal selections endorsed unanimously by the commission on Wednesday. The governor has moved quickly in recent months to fill the remaining vacancies on California’s mid-level courts before he leaves office next year. Newsom publicly nominated eight candidates, including Sapp, on Aug. 7 and days later the Commission on Judicial Appointments scheduled confirmation hearings this week.
Wednesday, August 19, 2026
FRAP proposals
Proposed FRAP Amendments are here -- relating to service and electronic filing by self-represented litigants. Comments due Feb. 15, 2027.
CJA hearings (2d Dist.) 8/19&20
The commission will consider the following 2DCA appointment on Wednesday, August 19, 2026:
The commission will consider the following 2DCA appointment on Thursday, August 20, 2026:
Tuesday, August 18, 2026
The End of 'Dismiss and Appeal'
In Law360, Josh Patashnik of Ashurst Perkins has Calif. Justices' Ruling Reshapes Midcase Appeal Strategy -- The California Supreme Court's unanimous July 16 decision in Maniago v. Desert Cardiology Consultants' Medical Group Inc. resolves a long-running split among intermediate appellate courts in the state and delivers a clear message to civil litigators: A voluntary dismissal cannot be used as a shortcut to appellate review of interlocutory orders.
In the DJ, Myron Moskovitz has Working, Part 3: Reviewing the reporter's transcripts -- Winning appellate arguments often hide in the reporter's transcripts, where a judge's revealing remark, a damaging concession or a witness's memorable testimony can become the brief's most persuasive line.
Friday, August 14, 2026
2d/3d Dist. pro tem update
- Judge Melanie P. Ochoa of the Los Angeles County Superior Court will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Three through August 31, 2026
- Judge Curtis E.A. Karnow (Retired) of the San Francisco County Superior Court will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Three through September 22,
- Judge Vicki Ashworth (Retired) of the El Dorado County Superior Court will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Three through October 14, 2026
- Judge Jessica Delgado of the Santa Clara County Superior Court will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Three through September 30, 2026
- Judge Sanjay Kumar (Retired) of the Los Angeles County Superior Court will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Five through October 18, 2026
- Judge Ronda J. McKaig of the Ventura County Superior Court will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Six through August 31, 2026
Wednesday, August 12, 2026
Sanctions for frivolous writ
4/3 imposes $5K in sanctions for a frivolous writ petition here.
When attorneys make misleading statements to courts or fail to promptly update courts when new facts emerge that are relevant to a matter under consideration, courts unnecessarily expend resources assessing issues under false premises. And only when counsel’s zealous advocacy is exercised consistent with counsel’s duty of candor to the court can the judicial system achieve its goal of ascertaining the truth.
...
The petition ... was plainly frivolous when filed in light of the undisclosed information about the San Diego action. No court would issue extraordinary writ relief to remedy a trial conflict that no longer existed. No reasonable attorney would file a writ petition on this factual record, making the arguments that were made in the petition ....
[The MetNews article is C.A. Imposes $5,000 Sanction on Lawyer for Lack of Candor -- Attorney Sought Writ, Saying Dates of Two Trials—One Set for June 29 in Orange County, the Other for May 15 in San Diego Superior Court—Conflicted; Justices Not Told Earlier of Two Proceedings Had Been Moved to October; The DJ's article is Attorney sanctioned $5,000 over frivolous writ petition --California appellate court fined attorney $5,000 after finding he failed to disclose that a trial conflict cited in his writ petition had already been resolved.]
CJA-palooza!
The commission will consider the following appointments on Aug. 19:
- 1 p.m.: David Sapp, as associate justice of the Third Appellate District (Sacramento)
- 2 p.m.: Judge Lauri Damrell, as associate justice of the Third Appellate District (Sacramento)
- 3 p.m.: Judge Frederick Chung, as associate justice of the Sixth Appellate District (San Jose)
- 4 p.m.: Judge Denise Hippach, as associate justice of the Second Appellate District, Division Six (Ventura)
- 9:30 a.m.: Justice Rashida Adams, as presiding justice of the Second Appellate District, Division Three (Los Angeles)
- 10:30 a.m.: Judge Juliet Macaulay, as associate justice of the Fourth Appellate District, Division Three (Santa Ana)
- 11:30 a.m.: Judge Lisa Rodriguez, as associate justice of the Fourth Appellate District, Division One (San Diego)
- 12:30 p.m.: Judge Marsha Amin, as associate justice of the Fourth Appellate District, Division One (San Diego)
Tuesday, August 11, 2026
6th DCA CJA hearing set
RIP Justice Slough (1958-2026)
The DJ has Justice Marsha Slough, 1958 -- 2026: Retired 4th District Court of Appeal justice was "blue-collar" jurist, led court through pandemic
Retired Justice Marsha G. Slough, whose two decades on the California bench took her from working directly with troubled teenagers in San Bernardino County to helping lead the state judiciary through the COVID-19 pandemic, died Saturday following an illness. She was 68.
Slough retired from the 4th District Court of Appeal, Division 2, in Riverside in 2023 after nearly a decade on the appellate bench.
Monday, August 10, 2026
9th Cir. tech issue extends deadlines
The court will sua sponte extend all deadlines for filings due today under Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(3).
FVAP opinion is out!
The Supreme Court's opinion in FVAP v. Superior Court has issued here, and the disposition is:
Let a writ of mandate issue directing the respondent superior courts to provide indigent litigants, upon request, with meaningful access in all cases to an official verbatim record of proceedings, including by means of electronic recording if an official reporter or official reporter pro tempore is unavailable."courts can and should imply an exception to section 69957 where reasonably necessary to provide indigent civil litigants with meaningful access to justice and an official verbatim record." (Opn. at 5.)
Friday, August 7, 2026
Justice Appointments!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FVAP opinion to issue on Monday!
FAMILY VIOLENCE APPELLATE PROJECT et al. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY S288176 (Original proceeding) Argued in Los Angeles 6-03-26 This case presents the following issue: Does the prohibition on electronic recording of certain proceedings in Government Code section 69957, subdivision (a) violate the California Constitution when an official court reporter is unavailable and a litigant cannot afford to pay a private court reporter?
Thursday, August 6, 2026
Updated LASC App Div Hearing Dates
Updated 2026 Oral Arguments Hearing Dates
The Sept.17 Appellate Division oral argument has been moved to Sept. 24, 2026. Hearings will generally be set at 9 a.m. for infraction and misdemeanor cases and at 1:30 p.m. for limited civil cases in the Appellate Division courtroom, located in Room 615 at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse, 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, on the following dates, subject to further order of this court. The revised 2026 schedule is here.Wednesday, August 5, 2026
CJA hearings Aug. 6
The following is the morning schedule for the Second District:
- 9:00 a.m.: Justice Tari Cody as presiding justice of the Second Appellate District, Division Six (Ventura)
- 10:00 a.m.: Judge Nicholas Daum as associate justice of the Second Appellate District, Division Four (Los Angeles)
Family Law appellate mcle program
On November 4 at noon, LACBA's Appellate and Family Law Sections will present Family Law Appeals: Initial Quick Decisions, with panelists Claudia Ribet (certified appellate and family law specialist) and Greg Ellis (certified appellate specialist) (both at CALG and both CAAL members).
A program addressing important issues in family law appeals: (1) the new Statement of Decision statute, and anticipated rules of court; (2) the collateral order doctrine, and how it functions in family law; and (3) immediate appeals in bifurcated rulings under California Rules of Court rule 5.932.
Tuesday, August 4, 2026
Published sanctions order
2/4 publishes an OSC order imposing $1,000 in sanctions here, which begins:
An adverse ruling is not evidence of judicial bias. And lawyers may not accuse a judge of bias without evidence. We publish this opinion as a warning to those who appear before the appellate bench. Challenges to the integrity of the hard-working, dedicated trial judges of this state must be based on evidence in the record, not the personal frustrations of counsel or parties. Members of the bar may not spew allegations of judicial bias merely because they disagree with a ruling. Counsel must not expect courts of appeal to allow such baseless outbursts.
(Watch the oral argument here (staring at 59'30"))