- The Seventh Circuit on Thursday refused to revive a former Mars warehouse worker's discrimination suit, saying her appeal was a "shameful waste of judicial resources" and demanding her attorney explain why he shouldn't be sanctioned. ... The three-judge panel said in its opinion that [Plaintiff's] appeal ... was 'utterly frivolous,' and that her 'monstrosity of an appellate brief' ["86 interminable pages"] was 'incoherent.'"
- "The hopelessness of [Plaintiff's] cause didn't deter her lawyer ... from signing and submitting a bizarre appellate brief laden with assertions that have no basis in the record and arguments that have no basis in the law."
- Fn.5: "The term 'brief'—derived from the Latin brevis, meaning short—seems inapt here. ... The brief is also a typographical nightmare. It uses five different fonts and various font sizes, including three different fonts in one sentence, and capitalizes words seemingly at random.
- "Bad writing does not normally warrant sanctions, but we draw the line at gibberish."
SCAN: News and resources for Southern California appellate lawyers, featuring the Second and Fourth District Courts of Appeal and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Friday, November 8, 2019
"Monstrosity of an appellate brief"
A little late for Halloween, but: 7th Circ. Calls Appeal Bid In Mars Bias Suit A 'Monstrosity'