That's the title of Justice Hoffstadt's latest DJ article, which begins:
Precedent
sometimes rests upon a legal fiction, and persists until a later decision
exposes the fiction for what it is. People v. Sanchez, 63 Cal.
4th 665 (2016) exposed as a fiction the long-held position that out-of-court
statements admitted to explain the basis for an expert witness’ opinion are not
admitted for their truth. But what happens after such a
revelation? That is what the California courts are struggling with addressing
right now.