Last month we posted about judicial rescuse missions and Mr. Good's "stubborn refusal" to follow the appellate rules (
here). A more detailed discussion of
Good v. Miller appears in yesterday's Daily Journal article "A Bad Outcome for Mr. Good," by Reed Smith's Appellate Practice Group Chair Paul Fogel (Hon. ret.) and associate Ilana Herscovitz. They characterize
Good's result as "harsh yet refreshing." Makes it sound like a stiff drink...