The following judge is currently sitting on assignment with the 5th District:
• Judge Gregory T. Fain of the Fresno County Superior Court will be sitting pro tempore until September 30, 2025.
SCAN: News and resources for Southern California appellate lawyers, featuring the Second and Fourth District Courts of Appeal and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
The following judge is currently sitting on assignment with the 5th District:
• Judge Gregory T. Fain of the Fresno County Superior Court will be sitting pro tempore until September 30, 2025.
The following are currently sitting on assignment in the 2d District:
• Judge Stephen Goorvitch of the Los Angeles County Superior Court will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Two from July 15, 2025, until September 14, 2025
• Judge Kimberly A. Gaab of the Fresno County Superior Court will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Three until August 30, 2025
• Judge Kira Klatchko of the Riverside County Superior Court will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Three until August 4, 2025
• Judge Emily Garcia Uhrig of the Los Angeles County Superior Court will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Four until July 19, 2025
• Justice Laurence D. Rubin (Retired) of the Second District Court of Appeal will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Eight until August 31, 2025
Law.com has 7th Circuit Denies Bid to Transfer Case Against Ex-Judge Posner to Different Appeals Court
The Ninth Circuit seeks comments to proposed rule revisions, here: proposed-cr-revisions-public-comment-6-2025.pdf -- "These proposed minor, non-substantive revisions would clarify existing rules and align them with recent updates and court practices."
We transferred this case from the appellate division of the superior court to decide whether a tenant can appeal a judgment for possession in an unlawful detainer proceeding if the landlord has outstanding damages claims that have not been adjudicated. The answer is no. If the landlord’s complaint seeks damages, the possession-only judgment is not appealable because it does not resolve all rights of the parties.
CalMatters has California doesn’t have enough court reporters. Their unions are fighting substitutes
Another SoCal appellate legend has passed away: the remarkable Tom Kally, retired Appellate Lawyer/CAAL member/2d District Managing Attorney. Tom was a founder and the First director of CAP-LA. His accomplishments and publications will live on, as will the memories of those who knew him as a scholar and gentleman. (Click the link on his name above to learn more about Tom's amazing life.)
On July 9 at 12:30 to 1:30 BHBA's Litigation Section presents Kirk Jenkins on Embedding Appellate Attorneys on Trial TeamsJoin us for a dynamic CLE that unveils how integrating an appellate specialist into your trial team—early and strategically—can be the game-changer your case needs. This session explores the essential role appellate attorneys play throughout the litigation lifecycle and at trial. From shaping persuasive motions, preserving the record of your opponent’s errors at trial (and preventing yours), to crafting post-verdict strategies and navigating complex interim appellate interventions. Learn how appellate insight sharpens trial themes, strengthens records, and anticipates developments to maximize outcomes at every stage of litigation and trial.
1 p.m. - hearing for Justice Zukin to become 2/4's PJ
~2 p.m. - hearing for Judge Tamzarian to 2/4
~3 p.m. - hearing for Judge Hanasono to 2/3
[Less than 30 minutes after taking the oath, the 2d District's justices website page has been updated to show Presiding Justice Zukin. Ditto re Justice Tamzarian and Justice Hanasono (who's webpage was posted while he was giving his thank-you remarks!). Great job at the court for getting this up so promptly.]
Commission Confirms Appointments to Appellate Court in Los AngelesOral arg mistake of the year here? A little "honey" goes the wrong way...
It appears [Appellant] recorded the hearing on the motion for reconsideration without the permission of the trial court, in violation of California Rules of Court, rule 1.150(d). We have augmented the record on appeal to include this recording. We do not sanction recording of trial court proceedings without advance approval by the court. However, under the extremely specific circumstances presented here, in which (1) the absence of a reporter’s transcript is due to judicial error and not attributable to the appellant, and (2) on appeal both parties rely on appellant’s record of the hearing, we consider the recording of the hearing on equitable grounds and only for the limited purpose of reviewing [Appellant's] claim she was denied a fair hearing on the motion for reconsideration.
The MetNews reports that LASC Appellate Division Judge Sanjay Kumar is slated to retire July 15, and has this article: Judge Sanjay Kumar Reflects on Career in Law:
The last 15 years on the Appellate Division have been rewarding. Although it is a relatively unknown wing of the superior court, it houses judges who have an exceptional work ethic and are committed to drafting opinions that provide proper guidance to the trial courts regardless of personal beliefs or political trends. I considered Presiding Judge McKay to be an intelligent colleague when I began in the Appellate Division but now she is also a sister-like figure.
Law360 has Justice Jackson Tops Royalties And Trip Disclosures In 2024 reporting on disclosures by 8 of the 9 Justices released Tuesday. Bloomberg Law has Justice Jackson Reports Earning Over $2 Million for Memoir
The Judicial Council is seeking comments by July 6 regarding Proposed Legislation: Remote Access to Electronic Court Records. This includes:
Appellate court records The proposed location for the appellate court rules is title 8, chapter 3, article 5, sections 6895068952 of the Government Code. The proposed title of new article 5 is “Public Access to Electronic Records of the Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal.” Although chapter 3 of title 8 is titled “The Supreme Court,” it appears to be the location for all statutes applying to the administration of both the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeal.
This appeal illustrates the wisdom of William Shakespeare’s words, “Neither a borrower nor lender be; For loan oft loses both itself and friend.” (Hamlet, act I, scene 3.) Two friends bought a duplex together; one paid the down payment while the other, to even things out, paid a greater share of the monthly mortgage bill. The friendship soured, and one sued the other for partition and sale of the duplex as well as for an accounting. After an eight-day bench trial, the trial court found that the former friends had entered into an oral agreement on how to pay off the mortgage loan. The losing friend appeals, raising a panoply of arguments. Those arguments are either waived or meritless. We accordingly affirm.
ABTL's Members-Only Summer Judicial Reception will be outside at the Omni Hotel (in DTLA) on June 26, from 6 to 8 p.m., honoring the local judiciary, including the Ninth Circuit and 2d District Court of Appeal.
The Commission on Judicial Performance has instituted formal proceedings to inquire into matters concerning former Justice William J. Murray, Jr. of the California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District. The commencement of formal proceedings is not a determination of judicial misconduct. A copy of the Notice of Formal Proceedings is posted on the commission’s website at https://cjp.ca.gov (under “Announcements”). Former Justice Murray’s Answer to the Notice is due June 30, 2025. Upon filing, the former justice’s answer will be made available for public inspection.
In accordance with the rules that govern commission proceedings, a hearing will be conducted by special masters appointed by the Supreme Court. At the hearing, the parties will have an opportunity to introduce evidence and examine and cross-examine witnesses. Commission Trial Counsel, Mark A. Lizarraga, and Assistant Trial Counsel, Melissa G. Murphy, will serve as Examiners for the commission. Former Justice Murray is represented by Attorney Andrew J. Waxler of Los Angeles.
Following completion of the hearing, the special masters will provide the commission with a report containing findings with respect to the charges. The parties will have an opportunity to present their views on the report to the commission through briefing and argument. If the commission determines that the charges are proven by clear and convincing evidence, it is empowered to censure, publicly admonish, or privately discipline the former justice. Charges that the commission determines are not proven will be dismissed. A determination by the commission to censure or admonish a former justice is subject to discretionary review by the Supreme Court upon petition by the former justice.
The Recorder has Retired Appellate Justice Accused of Delaying Case Decisions for Years and the DJ has Retired justice faces discipline over chronic case delays at 3rd District and the MetNews has Retired C.A. Justice Faces Disciplinary Charges - William J. Murray Jr. Was Among Third District Justices Who Delayed in Deciding Cases, Sometimes for Years and the ABA Journal has Retired California justice faces disciplinary charges for allegedly taking too long to decide cases
|
From the State Bar of California: We are excited to announce the launch of rebranded certified specialist brochures and new digital certified specialist seals. The new brochures offer clearer details on the benefits of working with a certified specialist and help promote awareness of the specialization program. Additionally, the new digital seals highlight your expertise and achievement in your specialty area, making it easy to showcase this recognition to the public that is easily displayed in your email signature line and websites. Legal Specialization Brochures: Print-on-Demand and Free of
Charge You
can download the digital brochures on the State Bar’s Digital Brochures webpage or order them
free-of-charge on the print on-demand portal. The new process
requires you to create an online account to login to place your order. Please
see the user guide below for more information. [Appellate brochure here.] |
|
Digital Seals: Display Your Specialization on Your Website,
Email Taglines, and More Digital
seals are now available. You can download the seals in the following formats:
PNG (transparent background), JPG, PDF, and SVG (for scalability and
print). Below
is a user guide with step-by-step information about how to use the seals in
email signature lines and on websites. |
2/7 Research Attorney Hoa Hoang was recently appointed to the superior court, so there is now an opening in Justice Feuer's chambers.

Job title: Appellate Court Attorney - Division Seven
Location: Downtown LA
Associate Justice Gail Ruderman Feuer of the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, is accepting application for an appellate attorney to start in August 2025.
The attorney will work collaboratively with Justice Feuer in preparing opinions in a broad range of appeals, including civil and criminal cases. The attorney will have significant responsibility over complex and challenging cases and work in a collegial setting with Justice Feuer and her other appellate attorneys. The attorney’s duties will include reviewing appellate briefs and trial records, researching and analyzing legal issues, drafting proposed opinions, proofreading final opinions, and making recommendations on the resolution of appeals, among other tasks. Excellent analytical, writing, and research skills are mandatory, as well a strong work ethic and dedication to excellence. Familiarity with appellate practice and/or prior judicial clerkship experience is preferred.
Apply online with online application, cover letter, resume, and writing sample. For earliest consideration, please apply by June 17.
|
On July 29 at noon, BASF presents Trailblazing Women on California’s Courts of Appeal
Celebrating Seven Historic Female Firsts on California’s Courts of Appeal: Diversity, Representation, and the Judicial Appointments Process
| Date | Tuesday, July 29, 2025 |
| MCLE Registration | 11:30 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. |
| In-Person Program | 12:00 - 1:15 p.m. |
| MCLE | 1 Hour of Elimination of Bias |
| Location | BASF Offices 50 Fremont Street, Suite 1700 San Francisco, CA |
Speakers
|
|
This program highlights the groundbreaking contributions of seven trailblazing female justices who were the first to serve on California’s Courts of Appeal. Justice Shama Hakim Mesiwala will share insights into their historic achievements and the broader impact of representation in the judiciary. The program will also feature a Q&A with Deputy Appointments Secretary Adam Hofmann, who will discuss the judicial appointments process and the importance of cultivating a diverse and inclusive applicant pool. Attendees will gain a deeper understanding of how diversity enhances the fairness and credibility of California’s justice system.
Trailblazing Female Firsts
Annette Abbot Adams: First California Female Justice
Arleigh Woods: First California African American Female Justice
Sheila Prell Sonenshine: First California Jewish American Female Justice and youngest California Intermediate Appellate Court Justice
Joyce Kennard: First California Asian American Female Justice, First California Immigrant Female Justice, First California. non-native English-speaking Female Justice, and First California disabled Female Justice
Ramona Godoy Perez: First California Hispanic Female Justice
Eileen Moore: First and only California Female Military Veteran Justice
Therese Stewart: First California openly Lesbian Justice